|  | |
quoting ArmOfAtlas:
there should probably be some sort of "blocking committee." Though it'd probably be difficult to set something like that up, i feel there should be a substancial amount of input from multiple users before a block can be preformed. After all, this is a free speech kind of place and i'd hate to see everyone with the ability to block whoever they want. Then it would be "Tainted Thoughts: world of pissy little bitches," and no one really wants that.
Some ideas, though:
-all items from a blocked member must be approved
-the blocked member should have some "dunce hat" icon or something identifying them as a blocked member
-normal users should have the right to hide their posts from any/all blocked users
stuff like that, i suppose. but i'm not really an administrator, but if you want, i can be the blocker... "ArmOfAtlas. Grand Lord of Blocking Bitches." haha.
Actually, I think we are talking about different things here. When I meant blocking members, I meant a mechanism members can employ against one another (for example, to prevent harassment). I think you may have interpreted what I said as a banning system from the site altogether (which we already have and use only sparingly; only those who have spammed TT or tried exploits have been banned so far).~~~~~~~~~~ "In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand, at the mongrel dogs who teach, fearing not I'd become my enemy, in the instant that I preach. My existence led by confusion boats, mutiny from stern to bow. Ah, but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now." - Bob Dylan
[ creating worlds ]
www.sikosoft.com
| |