It's probably not a big surprise that I would say yes to both. Previous posters have made good points so I don't know if there's any bigger need for me to write down why, as it's similar.

i think it's been said, yes to both, for previously stated reasons.

1. I think that homosexuals have much a right to marriage as any other person in the world. I don't see them as doing anything wrong.. they deserve to be as happy (or as miserable ) as the rest of us in marriage. And they have to pay taxes like the rest of us, but don't get the same benefits as the rest of us? I don't see how that could possibly be fair.

2. I agree with Britt here. There are SO many children out there that are in need of love and loving, stable homes. Being gay/lesbian/other doesn't mean you are unable to love a child or are unstable emotionally, mentally or financially. I knew a guy that was raised by his lesbian mother and her girlfriend and he was a good guy overall.. had he not mentioned his 'Moms', i would have never known.
I also know at least a couple of gay/lesbians that have children from other relationships and those are some of the sweetest kids I have ever met.

Basically i see it as love is love, no matter who (or 'what') you are

1. Conflicted. First, obviously, I'm a Christian.. We all know what the Bible says. But on the other hand, I don't think there should be restrictions on love. Unfortunately, I can't chose, but in general, I lean more towards a no.

2. Yes. Tons of kids need to be adopted, and just because people are gay doesn't mean they can't extend love out to a child. I know of a few gay/lesbian couples who either have kids from previous relationships or adopted on their own as a single person and they're very loving and nurturing and their kids are generally well rounded.